Hi, On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 10:55:06AM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote: > On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 08:58:35PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Axel Thim of ATrpms.net has contacted us and offered to fund the domain > > autofs.org and provide web, lists, CVS/subversion infrastructure under the > > same resourse structure as ATrpms.org. > > what's wrong with sf.net?
Nothing per se. sf.net would also be something to consider. Pro/Cons are + sf.net has infrastructure in place for setting up projects with the above mentioned resources + guaranteed independence of any resource manager + mirroring inclusive - No subversion (yet?) - Anon CVS lagging behind - list management could be better - bug reporting system (if used at all) is not as good as a bugzilla instance (depending on taste). In general a custom setup offers more flexibility and I could confirm that the hosting site would run autofs itself ;) I could also setup a wiki.autofs.org to have users contribute documentation, example setups etc. Anyway that would be just a way to say thanks for us using autofs4 :) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
