hi ya
On Mon, 3 May 2004, Tim Hockin wrote:
> Seeing as autofs is open, what's wrong with BK? BK rockssssss
getting the autofs.org domain name is trivial ...
- i've always wondered why nobody got it
is autofs(4) looking for a new home ???
is hpa lending the resources of kernel.org for autofs4 ??
- i think its best to keep autofs4 close to the kernel
in my limited view
if autofs needs some machines for testing ... there's
plenty of spare metal around here
--------
why one app is better than another is the general issues
- and the users should decide and/or even better
if the two systems can co-exists
( eg sourceforge + sf.net + yet-another-hosting
- only major issue is license terms and use of otehr peoples
machines and connectivity and datacenters
(the marketing/ceo/cfo/laywers are starting to get into the picture
c ya
alvin
_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
