On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 07:47:31AM -0800, John Admanski wrote: > The "bin" thing is really just historical; it's pretty pointless, I just > don't think anybody has really cared enough to go through the trouble of > eliminating it. You have to be careful, because bin is also where the > executables live so you have to make sure you fix up anything executing > scripts in there, not just all the import statements.
Makes sense. > > As for the kvm libraries, I think that looks fine, not being all that > familiar with them. It would be nice for generic code to go in client/bin > (or client/common_lib). Is there a reason to not add generic client code to "client/<module_name>" instead of "client/bin/<module_name>"? I think the length of our module paths (e.g. "autotest_lib.client.bin.<module>") is an annoying issue today, and eliminating "bin" on new modules would make it a little better. -- Eduardo _______________________________________________ Autotest mailing list [email protected] http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
