On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 08:08:36PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 17.04.06 10:28, Trent Lloyd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > that said if your xml2man actually works and generates correct manpages > > > > it may be worth adding support. > > > > > > > > Trent > > > YEs it generates corrrects manpages, so why not use correct filename > > > xml2man > > > instead the unknown xmltoman? > > > > Because to repeat earlier, xmltoman is correct for the program we use. > > > > Can you please provide me a URL to the source for 'xml2man' > > I guess he's using the tool that is included in the docbook utility > packages. It's a tool for converting docbook manuals to man pages. The > XML format used by that tool and the one we require is completely > different.
Well this is why I asked if it generates correct man pages - to which he said yes (i had my doubts) and why I wanted to get it to try it for myself. I guess if it doesn't work then, it doesn't :) Trent > > Lennart > > -- > Lennart Poettering; lennart [at] poettering [dot] net > ICQ# 11060553; GPG 0x1A015CC4; http://0pointer.net/lennart/ > _______________________________________________ > avahi mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/avahi -- Trent Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bur.st Networking Inc. _______________________________________________ avahi mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/avahi
