At 10:42 28/3/01 +0200, Leo Simons wrote:
>- we offer more logging features to people building on top
>of Avalon.
What features from Log4j would you like to see?
>- we remove the duplicity of having two logging packages
>on Jakarta.
theres 5+ templating languages at Apache, 2 regex projects etc.
>- we get the advantages of a larger developer pool and more
>synergy between Jakarta projects.
and more dynamicism. Avalons bad enough at the moment - it is meant to
stabilize at avalon 4.0. If we introduce a logging package that changes 2-3
times a week this is not a service to our users.
>These reasons are, IMO, enough to warrant the work and the
>speed loss.
>
>So, here's my +1
and my veto -1
;)
If the logging JSR comes out and is widely accepted that may be a viable
platform but I really don't see any need to change yet - maybe you can
convince me ;)
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
