LogKit is
easy to understand, clean and faster than Log4J.
I think LogKit is batter than Log4J in Avalon at least.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Leo Simons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Avalon Development" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 5:42 PM
Subject: [vote] long term logging proposal
> In Avalon 4, move to Log4j in favor of the current LogKit,
> for the reasons explained in my other e-mail:
>
> - we offer more logging features to people building on top
> of Avalon.
> - we remove the duplicity of having two logging packages
> on Jakarta.
> - we get the advantages of a larger developer pool and more
> synergy between Jakarta projects.
>
> These reasons are, IMO, enough to warrant the work and the
> speed loss.
>
> So, here's my +1
>
>
> Leo Simons
> (hehehe. My first vote is on my own proposal =)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
