Leo Simons wrote:
>
> In Avalon 4, move to Log4j in favor of the current LogKit,
> for the reasons explained in my other e-mail:
>
> - we offer more logging features to people building on top
> of Avalon.
apparently not. I believe it has all the features that Avalon users
need, and others could be added if requested.
> - we remove the duplicity of having two logging packages
> on Jakarta.
> - we get the advantages of a larger developer pool and more
> synergy between Jakarta projects.
I don't think these are convincing. There are other duplications within
Jakarta. What matters is that Avalon/ Phoenix has logging that works for
it.
>
> These reasons are, IMO, enough to warrant the work and the
> speed loss.
-1 Sorry, I don't think you've made a convincing case for dropping
LogKit.
Charles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
