Tom,

> Actually, I'll take commit access right now, thank you very much.  :)  

:-)

> BTW, the voting process here differs from the dbXML list in that 
> anyone on the dbXML lists, commiter or not, gets to vote.  Personally, 
> there's already far too much code to consider this an experiment.  If 
> you're going to move forward with it, it should probably be done so as 
> a separate, Jakarta project...  Including a db (Avalon-based or not) 
> as an avalon sub-project would be like trying to place dbXML under the 
> Cocoon projects.  While there's a possible relationship there, it's a 
> non-exclusive one, that doesn't really warrant a tight bond. 

Full project status would be good. Problems 1) the powers that be must 
see a few active committers before considering a project at jakarta 
level.  2) This might still turn out to be insane ... jakarta has a 
section for failed projects!!  I think we're some weeks away from 
satisfying requirements to go to the next stage.  Fingers crossed though.

Regard,.

- Paul H


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to