Peter, >>While looking through Eung-Ju's excellent RmiListener block it was >>apparent that the blocks were blockAdded() in an expected order. That >>is new to me and good news if true. Is it that they are added in the >>same order as listed in assembly.xml ? >> > >No ;) > >The blocks are loaded accorind to their dependencies. So if Block A depends >on Block B then B will be loaded before A (and shutdown before A). It is >probably the case that it will be in order defined in assembly.xml excluding >dependencies - however this should not be relied upon because it may change >in the future ;) (Well probably not but you shouldn't be relying on it >anyways). > In which case dude, could we have a startupCompleted() or blocksAdded() or initialBlocksAdded(). This will help having cleaner code in blockAdded() The buffering of things that can;t be used yet is *very* cumbersome.
Regards, - Paul H -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
