On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 22:32, Paul Hammant wrote:
> Peter,
>
> >>In which case dude, could we have a startupCompleted() or blocksAdded()
> >>or initialBlocksAdded(). This will help having cleaner code in
> >>blockAdded() The buffering of things that can;t be used yet is *very*
> >>cumbersome.
> >
> >Yep - on my todo list ;) I need to try a few things to see which is the
> >easiest and cleanest way to do things.
>
> I'll leave it in your hands then. If you are too overwhelmed tell me
> what method name you would choose and I'll do the work (after approving
> patches through you).
Okay the names of the methods I was thinking about (and when they get called)
was in that last mail I sent to Stephen and then he reforwarded to this list.
The application startup method would accept a ApplicationEvent object (that
had a method to return the SarMetaData).
The applicationFailed() method (or whatever it was called) would then accept
an exception and that would be the cause of application failure.
Other events would have 0 parrameters.
> I see you are quite busy on Ant
yep - will be for a bit too ;)
> and a possible
> forthcoming Logger flame war on commons :-) Incidentally, perhaps I
> should have spotted that last and intervened earlier.
nah I am done with that. Let there be 10 versions of each object at Jakarta I
say ;)
--
Cheers,
Pete
---------------------------------------------------
"Wise men don't need advice. Fools don't take it."
-Benjamin Franklin
---------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
