Peter,
>>ApplicationEvent
>>{
>> SarMetaData getSarMetaData();
>>}
>>
>>BlockListener
>>{
>>// as before plus ....
>> void applicationStarting();
>>
>
>lets make this one capable of throwing an exception - maybe
>ApplicationUnavailableException or UnavailableApplicationException or maybe
>even a vanilla Exception.
>
So the block listener developer instantiates and throws back? I'd go for :
ApplicationStartupException extended by VetoApplicationStartupException
(to please Stephen?).
>>Question, should these new methods go in an interface called
>>ApplicationListener that extends BlockListener or not?
>>
>
>not sure - that was something I was going to try out. I wanted to because I
>really really don't want to break backwards compatability prior to going beta
>however I am not sure if it is a good idea.
>
>Not sure what do you think?
>
For the sake of backCompat, I;d say ApplicationListener extends
BlockListener then.
Lastly, and unrelated. I'm (as you know) using Mozilla. Its inline
replies are apparently no so nice. Is the "double CR" like I'm using in
this reply better for you textmode readers? You using pine?
Regards,
- Paul H
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
