> I know, know, but when you dig deeper you will see how inconsistent > everything is.
Just out of curiosity, what do you find inconsistent? I know I've found some inconsistencies in how things are implemented, but that's life when you have 100s of developers working on one project. I think it is fairly clean given how many people were/are working on it. > It's to much marketing driven. It's a shame, because there are sure > good devs with great ideas at MS. I'll admit the MS Marketing machine went crazy and started calling everything .NET (Exchange, BizTalk, etc.). They really through out a lot of FUD that muddy the picture of the CLR and what it can be. > Ok I see your point. Maybe it's time to look on the framework and the > design and not on the language in which it is finally written. C#, VB.NET, Eiffel#, etc. are all just syntatic sugaring. The language that is finally used is called MSIL (Microsoft Intermediary Language) which is very similiar to Java Byte Code. I think that people keep focusing on the language and not the framework as you suggest. The framework is awesome! I finally get the good stuff that you Java guys have had for awhile :-) > So far +1 to see the implementation here. Maybe objective possibilty to > rate the power of .NET. Awesome! I'm hoping if this goes well that I can start porting the Avalon Framework, etc. Ya'll have got a lot of great code and design in this project. I want to open it up to the other side. I think that .NET developers would love to use Avalon Framework and Excalibur. Right now no one (that I know of) is thinking about how to extend the framework and make it (the framework) easier to work with. Its all about "Fire up my wizard and get some code!". Justin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
