Leo Simons wrote:
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 13:32, Stephen McConnell wrote:
<snip/>
Peter Donald wrote:
<snipped type="too"/>
No-one has decreed all unreleased or unstable code we have atm is to go
into the avalon-sandbox cvs. If we were to start completely afresh, I'd
agree. But we need to balance the amount of work and implications the
moving will take against the benefits.
If we move fortress to sandbox, and it is then indeed released in a
month or so, we need to move it back. Silly, confusing, lots of work,
messes up cvs. Same for phoenix-related code.
Leo:
Fortress is a special case that I think we should discussed
seperately
If something is unreleased, then if its specific to Phoenix
then either (a) move it into the Phoenix project (loader?,
containerkit?, etc.), or (b) move to the the sandbox.
From there on - the process of release is the only tangible
process we have available to us unless we decide to let
ourselves slip into subjective notions of what is contentious
and what isn't. Release is a point at which we take on
increased responsibility to the board and to our users. We
should reflect this by being consistent with our structure.
Cheers, Steve.
cheers,
- Leo
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
