Leo Simons wrote:
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 13:32, Stephen McConnell wrote:
<snip/>

Peter Donald wrote:
<snipped type="too"/>

No-one has decreed all unreleased or unstable code we have atm is to go
into the avalon-sandbox cvs. If we were to start completely afresh, I'd
agree. But we need to balance the amount of work and implications the
moving will take against the benefits.

If we move fortress to sandbox, and it is then indeed released in a
month or so, we need to move it back. Silly, confusing, lots of work,
messes up cvs. Same for phoenix-related code.
I agree. I might not compute, but it doesn't mean that we must impose stupid tricks because of refactoring elegance. We must work together in order to come up with a sane way for everybody to converge.

If the code is stable but there are no docs and release, what about writing some docs and making a release? No, I can't volunteer because I don't even know what that package does :/

--
Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to