> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > >However, if Avalon is going to adopt a <domain> ":" <key> > notion, then I > >suggest that Avalon vote to adopt RFC 2141, and incorporate > it by reference. > >Incorporating RFC 2141 will save you from having to go > through all of the > >arguments already dealt with during the production of the > RFC, and provides > >more detailed and specific information necessary for users > and implementers. > > > > Applying RFC 2141 is fine from my point of view. As such I need to > update the examples I provided earlier to reflect marlin and phoenix > as sub domains of the Avalon domain.
Wouldn't it be fine to have "avalon:" as the root? Like this: avalon:home.work avalon:merlin:something-special.whatever avalon:phoenix:something-solid.xxx Why make the string longer than it needs to be? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
