Berin Loritsch wrote:

From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Noel J. Bergman wrote:

However, if Avalon is going to adopt a <domain> ":" <key>
notion, then I

suggest that Avalon vote to adopt RFC 2141, and incorporate
it by reference.

Incorporating RFC 2141 will save you from having to go
through all of the

arguments already dealt with during the production of the
RFC, and provides

more detailed and specific information necessary for users
and implementers.

Applying RFC 2141 is fine from my point of view. As such I need to
update the examples I provided earlier to reflect marlin and phoenix
as sub domains of the Avalon domain.

Wouldn't it be fine to have "avalon:" as the root?  Like this:

avalon:home.work
avalon:merlin:something-special.whatever
avalon:phoenix:something-solid.xxx

Why make the string longer than it needs to be?

I would tend to agree - after reading through RFC 2141 my initial reaction was to cosider the domain compoent as "apache:avalon:...", however, it is also valid to say that we are dealing with things that are relative to the Context interface which is implicitly "avalon" as root. As such your suggestion is completely valid.

Cheers, Steve.


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




--

Stephen J. McConnell

OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to