Re: [PROPOSAL] avalon-sandbox/docs

[Nicola Ken Barozzi]

Peter Donald wrote:

On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 22:08, Stephen McConnell wrote:

Greg Stein wrote:

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Stephen McConnell"

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I would like to put together a docs project in avalon-samdbox in an
attempt to capture thoughts related to comtainment architectures and so
forth.

  my suggestions is avalon-sandbox/docs

Any problems and/or suggestions  - please post your opinions.

Why does this have to go into the sandbox? This isn't floating some
unrelated topic, but actual doc about Avalon itself. The sandbox is for
testing ideas(*) rather than developing real stuff.

Your right - there is no need for a sandbox project - its better just
to get on with the job and put it into the avalon site.

while it does not represent the thoughts of the rest of us it should not be placed in a prominent position and should be restricted to assembly/merlins website given that is the only place it is relevent.

As far as it's a WIP and marked as such, it's ok, and we are all entighteled to patch the doc and comment on it, to make it represent the thoughts of all of us.

As for sandbox sites.

If it's a sandbox project page it should not placed in a prominent position and *clearly* marked as a sandbox project site.

I propose that all sandbox projects prepend /sandbox/ to their URIs, as Jakarta commons does, in the sake of clearness. Mixing released and unreleased stuff is bad and has brought us only problems and bad pubblicity.

--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>