Peter Royal wrote:
I don't get it. You ask why he is emeritus and after you give an example of an emeritus committer coming back.On Monday, January 20, 2003, at 11:25 AM, Leo Sutic wrote:2. Larry is brought back to active committer status, just as we did with Stefano. Motivation for this is the same as for Stefano.
Who made Larry emeritus?
On <http://jakarta.apache.org/site/roles.html>
"At times, Committers may go inactive for a variety of reasons. A Committer that has been inactive for 6 months or more may lose their status as a Committer. Getting access back is as simple as re-requesting it on the project's Developer mailing list. "
note the *MAY LOSE*....
Stefano himself said that he would not consider himself a voting member unless voted back:
<http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=avalon-dev&m=102373200631583&w=2>
If he wants to come back he can just ask and we can get him back in with a quick vote, like we did with Stefano, I don't see the problem. Why would Larry have to be treated differently from Stefano?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
