Peter Donald wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001 06:10, giacomo wrote:
I have to confess that I don't know how this works in all my components
that are based on AbstractLoggable and have the logger passed in from
ExcaliburCM.
Just looked at ExcaliburCM and it doesn't really support separate loggers per
component. Berin what do you think of adding an extra attribute to component
definition so that you can specify name of logger. Then later on instead of
doing
I was thinking about that before. We need to add an attribute to the component
definitions (probably "logger"). Something like this to specify it:
<component role="com.foo.Component"
class="com.foo.DefaultComponent"
logger="foo"/>
The attribute name is negotiable ;).
Think this will help, combined with your changes for the Logger?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
