On Wed, 8 Aug 2001 22:42, Berin Loritsch wrote: > Peter Donald wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 8 Aug 2001 06:10, giacomo wrote: > >>I have to confess that I don't know how this works in all my components > >>that are based on AbstractLoggable and have the logger passed in from > >>ExcaliburCM. > > > > Just looked at ExcaliburCM and it doesn't really support separate loggers > > per component. Berin what do you think of adding an extra attribute to > > component definition so that you can specify name of logger. Then later > > on instead of doing > > I was thinking about that before. We need to add an attribute to the > component definitions (probably "logger"). Something like this to specify > it: > > <component role="com.foo.Component" > class="com.foo.DefaultComponent" > logger="foo"/> > > The attribute name is negotiable ;).
logger works for me. > Think this will help, combined with your changes for the Logger? Which changes are you referring to? It should work without any changes. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
