Peter Donald wrote:
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001 22:42, Berin Loritsch wrote:
Peter Donald wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001 06:10, giacomo wrote:
I have to confess that I don't know how this works in all my components
that are based on AbstractLoggable and have the logger passed in from
ExcaliburCM.
Just looked at ExcaliburCM and it doesn't really support separate loggers
per component. Berin what do you think of adding an extra attribute to
component definition so that you can specify name of logger. Then later
on instead of doing
I was thinking about that before. We need to add an attribute to the
component definitions (probably "logger"). Something like this to specify
it:
<component role="com.foo.Component"
class="com.foo.DefaultComponent"
logger="foo"/>
The attribute name is negotiable ;).
logger works for me.
Think this will help, combined with your changes for the Logger?
Which changes are you referring to? It should work without any changes.
The changes that test if the "logger" variable has a value.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
