On Sun, 2 Sep 2001 00:36, Paul Hammant wrote: > >io.ClassLoaderObjectInputStream sounds good to me unless there is > > objections. > > Moved & booked in. Thought originally you were talking of the whole > filestore, but it's just the InputStream... > > Still have not resolved excalbur jar name. Shall I go ahead with name > of ... > > avalon-excalibur-4.0b5dev.jar > > ... throughout packages?
For the packages that absolutlely must be updated I would go avalon-excalibur-20010901.jar (ie unreleased CVS version built on specified date) For those that don't need to be updated or can live with last released version then leave them with avalon-excalibur-4.0b4.jar (ie released version) -- Cheers, Pete ------------------------------------------------------- "I would like to take you seriously but to do so would affront your intelligence" -William F. Buckley, JR ------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
