On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Charles Benett wrote:

> Peter Donald wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2 Sep 2001 00:36, Paul Hammant wrote:
> > > >io.ClassLoaderObjectInputStream sounds good to me unless there is
> > > > objections.
> > >
> > > Moved & booked in.    Thought originally you were talking of the whole
> > > filestore, but it's just the InputStream...
> > >
> > > Still have not resolved excalbur jar name.  Shall I go ahead with name
> > > of  ...
> > >
> > >    avalon-excalibur-4.0b5dev.jar
> > >
> > > ... throughout packages?
> >
> > For the packages that absolutlely must be updated I would go
> >
> > avalon-excalibur-20010901.jar (ie unreleased CVS version built on specified
> > date)
> >
> > For those that don't need to be updated or can live with last released
> > version then leave them with
> >
> > avalon-excalibur-4.0b4.jar (ie released version)
> >
>
> +1 makes sense to me

+1 makes sense to me, too.

Giacomo

>
> Charles
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to