Peter Donald wrote: > > On Sun, 2 Sep 2001 00:36, Paul Hammant wrote: > > >io.ClassLoaderObjectInputStream sounds good to me unless there is > > > objections. > > > > Moved & booked in. Thought originally you were talking of the whole > > filestore, but it's just the InputStream... > > > > Still have not resolved excalbur jar name. Shall I go ahead with name > > of ... > > > > avalon-excalibur-4.0b5dev.jar > > > > ... throughout packages? > > For the packages that absolutlely must be updated I would go > > avalon-excalibur-20010901.jar (ie unreleased CVS version built on specified > date) > > For those that don't need to be updated or can live with last released > version then leave them with > > avalon-excalibur-4.0b4.jar (ie released version) >
+1 makes sense to me Charles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
