Peter Donald wrote:
>On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 00:09, Peter Royal wrote:
>
>
>>On Wednesday 14 August 2002 07:36 am, Peter Donald wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 21:31, Stephen McConnell wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Independently of question concerning meta-models, we must at least
>>>> ensure that Phoenix provides support for Type DTD in order to
>>>>ensure interoperability.
>>>>
>>>>
>>The "Type DTD" you speak of is the forked-containerkit DTD?
>>
>>
>>
>>>It won't.
>>>
>>>
>>Why not?
>>
>>IIRC, the last major disagreement was over the metainfo for component
>>contexts? Is that still the case? Is that the only obstacle?
>>
>>
>
>Thats still the case but it is not the only obstacle. It also introduces a lot
>of unvalidated container specific stuff (extension stuff being main thing).
>
As mentioned in prev. email - this isn't about using a particular
meta-info API - its about being able to read xinfo files with different
shemas (blockinfo verus type). That does not introduce anything to do
with extensions.
S.
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
