On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:11, Paul Hammant wrote: > I'd prefer this to be done to HEAD entirely. Why? Well we have > pre-alpha of 4.1 available for download and no promises have been made > for alpha or beta of 4.1. If assembly.xml is present I'd imagine that > there is no need for the experimental code to be executed. As such, and > given all live usages of Phoenix will already have assembly.xml files in > the sar file, I'd suspect that there is not problem for head development..
It is not so much because it is experimental but because I don't want to break anything I can't fix and sans CVS access thats could happen. The changes are wide-ranging and require massive updates to a whole sleugh of files - mainly as auto-assembly was written on top of an ContainerKit-enabled Phoenix. So while there is such large changes I would prefer it to happen in a branch. We can suck it back into head in a few weeks if all goes well. -- Cheers, Peter Donald -------------------------------------------------- The fact that nobody understands you doesn't mean you're an artist. -------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
