OK then,
Coach us thru the cvs commands you'd have done.
-ph
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:11, Paul Hammant wrote:
I'd prefer this to be done to HEAD entirely. Why? Well we have
pre-alpha of 4.1 available for download and no promises have been made
for alpha or beta of 4.1. If assembly.xml is present I'd imagine that
there is no need for the experimental code to be executed. As such, and
given all live usages of Phoenix will already have assembly.xml files in
the sar file, I'd suspect that there is not problem for head development..
It is not so much because it is experimental but because I don't want to break
anything I can't fix and sans CVS access thats could happen. The changes are
wide-ranging and require massive updates to a whole sleugh of files - mainly
as auto-assembly was written on top of an ContainerKit-enabled Phoenix. So
while there is such large changes I would prefer it to happen in a branch. We
can suck it back into head in a few weeks if all goes well.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
