Okay - I will do that when I submit the patch ;) All the stuff I send now can be applied to HEAD unless I otherwise say something.
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:39, Paul Hammant wrote: > OK then, > > Coach us thru the cvs commands you'd have done. > > -ph > > >On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:11, Paul Hammant wrote: > >>I'd prefer this to be done to HEAD entirely. Why? Well we have > >>pre-alpha of 4.1 available for download and no promises have been made > >>for alpha or beta of 4.1. If assembly.xml is present I'd imagine that > >>there is no need for the experimental code to be executed. As such, and > >>given all live usages of Phoenix will already have assembly.xml files in > >>the sar file, I'd suspect that there is not problem for head > >> development.. > > > >It is not so much because it is experimental but because I don't want to > > break anything I can't fix and sans CVS access thats could happen. The > > changes are wide-ranging and require massive updates to a whole sleugh of > > files - mainly as auto-assembly was written on top of an > > ContainerKit-enabled Phoenix. So while there is such large changes I > > would prefer it to happen in a branch. We can suck it back into head in a > > few weeks if all goes well. -- Cheers, Peter Donald ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | I thought there was a knob on the TV to turn up the intelligence. | | There's a knob called "brightness", but it doesn't work. | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
