Now that AVaRICE 2.11 has been shipped, I'd consider changing away from CVS. No, sorry, I'm not a big fan of Git (as it changes basically the entire user interface when comparing with CVS or Subversion). If at all, I'd consider Mercurial, though given that all the codebase is essentially a one-man-show (thus obviating a real need for a *distributed* VCS), I'd rather simply use Subversion which I'm most used to.
Opinions? -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ _______________________________________________ avarice-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/avarice-user
