On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Geoffrey Hutchison <geoff.hutchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > In the past, we said that Avogadro 1.1.x shouldn't be packaged by Linux > distributions, since the library ABI might break. I think fairly soon, we can > guarantee it won't break - at least until Avogadro 2. > > Should we just go ahead and say "yes, please package this"? I think Avogadro > 1.1.x is definitely better than 1.0.3, so I don't see why we keep the old > version. We can very easily push out a 1.1.2 or 1.1.3 release to address some > of the rougher spots before Avogadro 2 firms up. > > Thoughts? > If we want to guarantee no more big changes, why not just go ahead and release/tag 1.2.0? I would be good with doing that, and I think it would be nice to make it clear by releasing 1.2.0 and drawing a proverbial line in the sand. There are a few changes pending that we can get merged and make the release.
Marcus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Avogadro-devel mailing list Avogadro-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/avogadro-devel
