Hi, On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 07:04:25PM -0400, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Michael Banck <mba...@debian.org> wrote: > > If avogadro2 is out by then, I can see about getting it packaged, but it > > might be premature to replace avogadro1 with it for the Debian release. > > > Avogadro 2 is totally compatible with being installed in the same > prefix as Avogadro 1, would it be reasonable to package it as as well > as Avogadro 1 rather than replacing? The executable is avogadro2, the > libraries have different names, share directory etc. > > Just a thought, if not then I am fine with holding off but I think it > would be nice to consider. Thanks for pushing us on this - it would be > great to get what we can in before the freeze.
That's certainly possible, but new packages need to get through manual archive review before they enter, and the last one I uploaded from scratch needed a couple of months. I guess the backlog will be cleared up, but who knows. So yeah, if avogadro2 is out by then it could also be an alternative, if we manage to package it fast enough. Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ Avogadro-devel mailing list Avogadro-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/avogadro-devel
