Oops, the direction property IS called .direction not position! I was confusing myself - easy to do :)
My Q. about defining as rotations still stands though. Mark On Jun 7, 1:00 pm, MarkC <[email protected]> wrote: > I did not have any problems converting the position to the new 3.5 > format, but the position property name is a bit confusing. > > Also as the position is a direction, how about being able to define > it > in rotation values? It would make tweening movement of the light > source much simpler. > > Mark
