I think Lite has some type of zSorting.. but maybe it is quite a bit different than that of 3.6? So, is the most stripped down scene in 3.6 equal in performance to Lite? If so, I may switch to 3.6 so that I can get the performance of Lite, but easily upgrade to 3.6's extra features if needed.
Thanks, Shawn On Oct 7, 12:44 am, WillNa <[email protected]> wrote: > On 6 oct, 14:41, savagelook <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Your assessment isn't far off. Lite simply offers better performance > > by limiting the amount of unnecessary calculations. Things like z- > > sorting and more expensive materials are left out so that it can > > smoothly render as many faces as possible. > > zSorting ?! > oops...so I had to use ownSession or something similar to kept a > correct zSorting ? > > > The long and short of it is that you should probably use lite > > (especially if you are doing mobile dev) unless there is functionality > > that you absolutely need in 3.6.0. > > well, i first thought the Path feature will be needed but using a mesh > (and not generating one) could be enought I think > > thanks
