On Fri, May 21 2010, Daniel Graña wrote: > Agree, but I tried hard to follow it, where I failed?
I don't know; I actually only read the patch on github, and had the impression the indentation was wrong. But I may be wrong about that. :) > Cool, latest patch http://gist.github.com/409014 > I did the changes you suggested and reused the "screent_t screen" variable > where possible. Loooks good. It would be nice if some people could torture the patch though. >> Do you plan to make an extra patch to unregister the systray when the >> widget disappear ? >> > > Prefer to do it in one patch, but can't find what is the best place to > unregister systray. The more you split your work, the happier I am. > What call systray widget destructor? luaA_widget_gc, which call the widget destructor. Note that you will have to count the systray widgets. -- Julien Danjou // ᐰ <[email protected]> http://julien.danjou.info
pgpNEJxQ01Y3o.pgp
Description: PGP signature
