-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Am 30.05.2010 12:32, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Fri, May 28 2010, Daniel Graña wrote: > >> And based on it, another patch approach >> http://github.com/dangra/awesome/commit/d872bf...<http://github.com/dangra/awesome/commit/d872bf46073fcda5bf68008b8d699bd0d780fe31> > > You wrote: > I am not really sure if globalconf.screens index matches phys_screen > > Indeed, it does not. phys_screen <= screens.len.
Shouldn't that always break with xinerama? (Only one phys_screen, multiple "virtual" ones) I wonder if it wouldn't make more sense to first make sure only one systray widget can be attached to any *physical* screen. And this makes me wonder if we shouldn't fix FS#556 (Create a new physical_screen_t structure)... > Otherwise the patch does not seems so bad, even if I don't like it > really. But that's not your fault. :) > > Anyone to review/test it ? Since I'm CC'd, I feel being pointed at. :P Sorry, no time right now, but I already marked this as "find the time to test this", but my time schedule is a little tight right now. Uli - -- - - Buck, when, exactly, did you lose your mind? - - Three months ago. I woke up one morning married to a pineapple. An ugly pineapple... But I loved her! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJMAkMwAAoJECLkKOvLj8sG/3MH/jtDHaiA0kfgTu5pOSRWXWxf fuELaOQffHfP1etwvR0vUsxTSEvazz9sF6urtRQVYXj95lmf096YktZsvr9XR1Pp U1bWhK6jqRaaEchG7RKJ/EOxnyANFtEhJ1NVYYUnwlcLfqsoq2m2Uvr/L/A17MfJ nuMjI2zC8EfH1rOlv2VtIbiWgHKlZ7WJfgDQNGHTwg2WM9Dp5++Q0PR40iPkNkQo 0ZJGSccmvdz7tOsTG00bScj68p0NNvZ/h6FrOFwrjmUBlbhoqFACVQel6/E85wN3 fRVyOa7B0z8YUBVx+RcVoUlBFptBs5ZpSNcidpeLUeFtpO2/s2oo5HYdmP+aKGU= =jxGR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
