On 04/11/2012 06:43 AM, Anthony Petrov wrote: > Hi Omair, > > The analysis below sounds reasonable to me, and as I've already > mentioned I'm OK with your fix. > > Let's hear what Artem says though.
Glad to see he agreed :) > PS. Perhaps it also makes sense to rewrite that comment in the > XDecoratedPeer to replace the word "bug" with something saying that this > is implemented according to the ICCCM specification with a reference to > the paragraph 4.1.5 of it? I have updated the webrev with such a comment: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/mutter-support/03/ Does it look okay? Thanks, Omair
