Ok, I will leave in Solaris 10 :
+ * @requires (os.family != "solaris" | os.version != "5.11")
--Semyon
On 05/02/2017 10:19 AM, Phil Race wrote:
The test ran fine on Solaris 10 with metacity.
> Solaris platform was added to the test exclusions because Solaris WM do
> not permit to bring a window on top programmatically.
I presume the problem is not that general. The test has a Frame which
owns a Dialog .. if the owned window can't be moved under the owner
window that is one thing but if it is true even for two Frames that would
be odd.
Is toFront implemented here using XRaiseWindow ?
Did the request definitely get forwarded to the window manager ?
I found the following but I am not sure if it is related ..
https://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/5.5/technical-notes/metacity.html
-phil.
On 04/28/2017 04:03 PM, Philip Race wrote:
Yes .. it is however "a datapoint". Also there are people in the
Solaris org.
we can ask ..
-phil.
On 4/28/17, 3:50 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Phil,
this is a jdk9 issue found on Solaris 11.3. But jdk8 should not be
very different.
Much appreciate it if you will be able to run
java/awt/Window/MultiWindowApp/MultiWindowAppTest.java on Solaris 10.
But I'm not sure about Solaris 10 WM Gnome version. Its behavior can
be different.
--Semyon
On 04/28/2017 03:32 PM, Philip Race wrote:
I believe yes gnome 2 and that gnome 3 is coming
I was also bit surprised by this.
toFront() has been around forever and I've no recollections with
issues on Solaris.
As a datapoint I can test this with a real desktop
(not xVNC) using Solaris 10 + JDK 8 next week ..
-phil.
On 4/27/17, 1:25 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Semyon
As far as I remember Solaris uses gnome2(metacity/compiz). Does it
mean it do not work on Gnome2?
----- semyon.sadet...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello,
Please review fix for JDK9:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8159904
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8159904/webrev.00/
Solaris platform was added to the test exclusions because Solaris WM
do
not permit to bring a window on top programmatically.
--Semyon
