Kai Kaminski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | > root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | On September 14, 2006 9:42 PM you wrote: | > | > > | > | > > > > > As far as I can see PLF is defined in Makefile.pamphlet | > | > > but never | > | > > > > > used anywhere in the source. | > | > > > > > | > | > > > > > I suggest we delete it before somebody tries to use it. We don't | > | > > > > > need more flags and special cases in the source if we can avoid | > | > > > > > it. | > | > | > | > Damn. So I guess it's too late. This stuff is everywhere. ;) | > | | > | Yeah, most of those conditionals are what make the C code hard to port. | > | > no harder than the lisp non-portable sutff all over the place in the | > Axiom source code. I don't think we have a perfect language match | > here in terms of portability. I've coded for longtime in C and C++; I | > don't think this particular is stuff is handled the proper way. | I'm not going to start another pro-Lisp discussion. But I'd like to | point out that Axiom's Lisp code is not representative of (modern) | Lisp code. Furthermore the conditionals aren't organized very well and | most of them are superfluos anyway, because they are for Lisps that | are long dead and forgotten.
Probably. I followed this discussion http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2006/014309.html with some interest. -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
