> It appears that we now have at least two "trunks" under SVN -- > ignoring for the moment, all the variations under other SCMs. That is > going to be more confusing to people already confused with the current > state of the affairs. We need to agree on THE trunk.
well i'm in the process of merging the old SVN/trunk with axiom--silver--1 so there will be only one SVN trunk again. the old SVN/trunk is effectively dead. > We also need to > agree about patch protocol. From my perspective, much of what we > agreed on back in April 2006 still hold. I would like to add one more > thing: That patches to silver be "self-contained" in the sense each > patch deal with conceptually one thing -- except of course for merges > from branches to trunk where we have already set the policy I think. > The reason for that is that it makes it easy for people to select the > patches they want to see on their branches. since silver patches are being released immediately it is likely that each changeset will be on a single topic in the future. what people do with their individual branches is up to them. the only issue arises when an SVN branch needs to be packaged as a changeset and merged into silver. t _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
