root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > It appears that we now have at least two "trunks" under SVN -- | > ignoring for the moment, all the variations under other SCMs. That is | > going to be more confusing to people already confused with the current | > state of the affairs. We need to agree on THE trunk. | | well i'm in the process of merging the old SVN/trunk with axiom--silver--1 | so there will be only one SVN trunk again. the old SVN/trunk is effectively | dead.
Ah, that is good to know! | | > We also need to | > agree about patch protocol. From my perspective, much of what we | > agreed on back in April 2006 still hold. I would like to add one more | > thing: That patches to silver be "self-contained" in the sense each | > patch deal with conceptually one thing -- except of course for merges | > from branches to trunk where we have already set the policy I think. | > The reason for that is that it makes it easy for people to select the | > patches they want to see on their branches. | | since silver patches are being released immediately it is likely that | each changeset will be on a single topic in the future. Great! | what people | do with their individual branches is up to them. the only issue arises | when an SVN branch needs to be packaged as a changeset and merged into | silver. We are in violent agreement. -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
