Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> You are suggesting having both the latex processing and the tangle >> operation performed by TeX code? Eeek. > > Hmm, the whole LaTeX3 project uses that approach. But I would say, the > tangle (docstrip) is quite weak.
I thought that Tim was working on having latex do both tangling and weaving. Am I misremembering, or did that direction die off? > OK, so why does nobody think of TeXmacs? ... > There is just one problem. As far as I can tell, there is no support for > literate programs in TeXmacs. There was some work done in that direction (see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.editors.texmacs.devel/2653), but I don't know if anything came of it. But is tying down Axiom development to one editor a good idea? (If it is a good idea, TeXmacs seems like a reasonable choice.) Jay _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
