On 05/02/2007 07:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ralf,
>
> The string contained within the chunkname field of
> \begin{chunk}{chunkname}
> is unparsed in the current code and can contain anything
> at all. It is purely used as a key to the hash table.
Really? The idea of LP actually says (at least to me) that chunkname
should be considered like a \section command, so it should have a very
meaningful name. And
<<*>>=
<<chunk1>>
<<chunk2>>
<<chunk3>>
@
(or the LaTeX-syntax equivalent)
should read like a table of contents. If you allow any character
(including % and $) to lose their usual TeX meaning then you forbid
\begin{chunk}{The first 10% of implementation of $a^2+b^2=c^2$}
...
\end{chunk}
to print nicely. (I could have escaped %, of course.)
Anyway, retaining TeX meaning of the characters is probably the better
way to go.
Ralf
_______________________________________________
Axiom-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
