Yes, you have a point there too! For some it might be an additional burden
to install java and even run the tool. Just a suggestion, how about
providing gensource for some of the samples only? Is this too much?

sanjaya.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Samisa Abeysinghe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: Removing generetd source from cvs [was:Re: cvs commit:
ws-axis/c/tests/client/interop/round1/gen_src SimpleTestSoap.cpp]


> IMHO, cvs is directly used by developers with some understanding -
> hence they will be capable enough to generate the sources using WSDL -
> despite that fact that we assume they got to have Java and Axis Java
> on the system.
>
> For release packages, both binary and source, lets package the
> generated source only for samples. This will help those users who do
> not have Java to try out Axis C++ just with the samples.
>
> Thoughts please!
>
> Thanks,
> Samisa...
>
>
> On 12 Jan 2005 18:38:12 +0600, Roshan Weerasuriya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > hi All,
> >
> > In my openion I think for the Samples it is better to keep the generated
> > code in the CVS, as the name itself implies that these are samples, so
> > there should be the sample codes/source_files to the user. (It is
> > certainly true that a user can generate these through the tool, but we
> > need to make the life simple for any kind of first time user of Axis C++
> > so that he will be encouraged to use Axis C++) We have to retain the
> > first time users of Axis C++, and we auctualy should let them feel that
> > Axis C++ is not much of a burden to be used.
> >
> > Roshan
> >
> > On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 16:43, Damitha Kumarage wrote:
> > > On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:22:19 +0600, sanjaya singharage wrote
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Adrian Dick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" <[email protected]>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 3:50 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Removing generetd source from cvs [was:Re: cvs commit:
> > > > ws-axis/c/tests/client/interop/round1/gen_src SimpleTestSoap.cpp]
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "sanjaya singharage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/01/2005
> > > > 09:34:14:
> > > > >
> > > > > > For a release of course we can proivde the source for the
samples
> > > > > generated
> > > > > > with the tool of that release. Otherwise I guess we will making
new uses
> > > > > > life more difficult.
> > > > >
> > > > > True, but they're going to need to generate the stubs for
themselves at
> > > > > some point.  Doing this as part of the samples seems a natural
part of the
> > > > > education.  (particularly as we'll be confident of these working
first
> > > > time
> > > > > and everytime)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes I think you have a point. As you say generating code should be a
> > > > "natural part". Agreed.
> > >
> > > FYI
> > > I have seen some guru saying somewhere that "when testing with an
application
> > > for usability in the first few minutes if you cannot make a sample
running
> > > successfully then stop cosidering it as an option." I don't know how
true this
> > > is. But it has some thing in it. Shall we get some burden of it in our
> > > deployment process and let new user have some relief. Of cousre he
will
> > > generated the stuff and go deeper in the next step
> > >
> > > thanks
> > > damitha
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > sanjaya.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "Adrian Dick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" <[email protected]>
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 3:21 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Removing generetd source from cvs [was:Re: cvs
commit:
> > > > > > ws-axis/c/tests/client/interop/round1/gen_src
SimpleTestSoap.cpp]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My opinion is that we should also remove them from samples,
certainly
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > CVS.  Maybe we need to ensure the samples documentation has
clear
> > > > > > > instructions for the users on generating stubs from the WSDL.
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Damitha Kumarage
> > > hSenid Software International (PVT) Ltd(Web: www.hsenid.com)
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > >
> > > Lanka Software Foundation (http://www.opensource.lk)
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>


Reply via email to