Hi Samisa, chunkBufferSize4MTOM or chunkBufferSizeForMTOM ? I think the second is better. :) Btw, as you say we need to add a comment saying that the size is in MB. That's what I emphasized in another reply to this mail.
Regards, Senaka > Manjula Peiris wrote: >> Hi devs, >> >> Inside mime_parser when the stream is chunked the data is written in to >> array of buffers. Currently the size of the buffer is hard coded and >> using this size we can optimize the memory usage for larger attachments. >> So I think we can put this size as a parameter in the axis2.xml. >> >> For an example a server frequently processing 50 MB attachments >> >> <parameter name=attachmentSize" locked="false">50</parameter> >> > > How about chunkBufferSize4MTOM as the param name? Using 'attachment' in > the param name is inconsistent, as othe MTOM related params have MTOM in > the name. e.g. enableMTOM > > Of course, a comment should mention that the given size is assumed to be > in MB. > > Samisa... > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
