On Feb 19, 2008 9:51 AM, Manjula Peiris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also think chunkBufferSizeForMTOM makes more sense. Actually I first
> thought about this but felt it is more complex for users. That's why
> suggest attachmentSize. But with a comment meaning of this param can be
> simplified.

IMHO, a better way to express the same would be *MTOMChunkBufferSize*.

Regards,
Dumindu.


-- 
Dumindu Pallewela
http://blog.dumindu.com
GPG ID: 0x9E131672

WSO2 | "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform" | http://wso2.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to