On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 11:39 +0530, Manjula Peiris wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> So I will use MTOMChunkBufferSize .
> 
> And we need to specify the number of buffers in this case. I like
> 
> MTOMChunkBuffers as the parameter name.

I think MTOMMAXChunkBuffers is good.

>  So in the chunking case the
> maximum size of the attachment the system can handle is,
> 
> MTOMChunkBufferSize * MTOMChunkBuffers.
> 
> Default for MTOMChunkBufferSize = 1
> Default for MTOMChunkBuffers = 1000
> 
> So in the default case it can handle 1000MB.
> 
> suggestions please...
> 
> Thanks,
> -Manjula.
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 11:23 +0530, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
> > Dumindu Pallewela wrote:
> > > On Feb 19, 2008 9:51 AM, Manjula Peiris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >   
> > >> I also think chunkBufferSizeForMTOM makes more sense. Actually I first
> > >> thought about this but felt it is more complex for users. That's why
> > >> suggest attachmentSize. But with a comment meaning of this param can be
> > >> simplified.
> > >>     
> > >
> > > IMHO, a better way to express the same would be *MTOMChunkBufferSize*.
> > >   
> > 
> > Ok, it is shorter. I like it.
> > 
> > Samisa...
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to