On Saturday 02 February 2002 09:27, Matt Sergeant wrote: > On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Marc-Olivier Bernard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is it, in both cases, in memory caching or object persistence ? > > In memory. Object persistence wouldn't work.
I'm not sure "object persistence wouldn't work" but the real question is would the overhead of serialization/deserialization be any less than the overhead of parsing the stylesheet each time? I doubt it would be much of a gain, unless the stylesheet itself is the result of significant processing, in which case its probably better done in some pre-processing step anyhow. > > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Marc-Olivier Bernard wrote: > > > > I would like to have some precisions on Apache::...::LibXSLT caching > > > > features : > > > > > > > > - for a basic xslt stylesheet (i mean without any *included* parts), > > > > is the tree structure of the stylesheet cached ? > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > - for a composed stylesheet, with included parts (through > > > > xsl:include, xsl:import or document()), is the *whole* stylesheet > > > > cached ? also as a tree structure ? > > > > > > Yes. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
