On Saturday 02 February 2002 18:44, Tod Harter wrote:
> On Saturday 02 February 2002 09:27, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Marc-Olivier Bernard wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is it, in both cases, in memory caching or object persistence ?
> >
> > In memory. Object persistence wouldn't work.
>
> I'm not sure "object persistence wouldn't work" but the real question is
> would the overhead of serialization/deserialization be any less than the
> overhead of parsing the stylesheet each time? I doubt it would be much of a
> gain, unless the stylesheet itself is the result of significant processing,
> in which case its probably better done in some pre-processing step anyhow.

No, object persistence "could" work but the gains are very incertain. The 
only efficient way of serialising an XML document (which a stylesheet is) is 
XML. All attempts thus far to find a better serialisation format have hit a 
wall which is the fact that XML parsers are very optimized beasts that are 
hard to beat at what they do. Also, the serialisation of a (possibly 
optimized after parsing) stylesheet object as returned for instance by 
XML::LibXSLT is not a trivial task as it isn't a pure Perl object.

One place where object persistence "might" be of interest is having those 
cached stylesheets in shared memory instead of in process memory. I am not 
sure that this would be a serious gain, unless of course one has many and/or 
large stylesheets. I'm willing to place this in the TODO if there's serious 
interest (ie someone that sees this as a real world problem, not just as a 
cool optimisation that'll save 200 bytes of memory).

-- 
_______________________________________________________________________
Robin Berjon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- CTO
k n o w s c a p e : // venture knowledge agency www.knowscape.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
All fangs and no brain.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to