On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Tod Harter wrote: > On Saturday 02 February 2002 09:27, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Marc-Olivier Bernard wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Is it, in both cases, in memory caching or object persistence ? > > > > In memory. Object persistence wouldn't work. > > I'm not sure "object persistence wouldn't work" but the real question is > would the overhead of serialization/deserialization be any less than the > overhead of parsing the stylesheet each time? I doubt it would be much of a > gain, unless the stylesheet itself is the result of significant processing, > in which case its probably better done in some pre-processing step anyhow.
Right that was the point (albeit I was being perhaps overly vague ;-). If you used object persistence, your persistent format would most likely be... XSL. -- <!-- Matt --> <:->Get a smart net</:-> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
