We were using XPathScript - it is a wonderfull tool but in reality LibXSLT is times faster. This was the main reason we started using XSLT instead XPS.
I think some STX that was mentionioned as planned for AxKit 1.7 will be a great solution :)), even faster than LibXSLT Pavel ----- Original Message ----- From: Robin Berjon To: Tom Howe Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:26 PM Subject: Re: AxKit for web applications Tom Howe wrote: > The only issues I have with this is that the XPathScript transformations > are not that fast, especially as there are multiple XPathScript > stylesheets applied for each page. This is *not* at all to feed the XPS vs XSLT thread, but if you have XPSs that do only transformations (ie nothing that couldn't be done in XSLT) have you tried porting them to XSLT (if only to compare speed)? I wouldn't surprised if LibXSLT were a lot faster (which is one good reason to port XPS to XML::LibXML). -- Robin Berjon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Research Engineer, Expway http://expway.fr/ 7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
